Question:
If everyone was gay, would the world come to an end?
James
2012-09-15 16:17:06 UTC
A dude can bang a guy in the bum all day, no baby is coming out. Don't you think being gay is wrong just on the simple fact that the world would come to an end if everyone was a fudgepacker.
Thirteen answers:
?
2012-09-16 18:03:30 UTC
If everyone was a female the world would come to an end.

if everyone was a male the world would come to an end.

If everyone was a baby the world would come to an end.



By that logic being a man or a woman or a baby is wrong. If you think being gay is wrong because if everyone was gay the world would come to an end than I'm sorry but you are borderline retarded, I'm not even kidding or mocking you, the inability to successfully arrive to such a simple conclusion is a red flag for low IQ.
Mrmanboy
2012-09-15 16:33:43 UTC
But James, everybody is not gay, and the same can be saidbout human fertility. If all women became infertile the world WOULD come to an end. Does that mean that being infertile (which is not a choice either) is wrong?

Besides if everyone did become gay, hypothetically, im sure society would realise that reproduction was vital and come up with a simple way to ensure the survival of the species...
Anjellis
2012-09-15 16:29:29 UTC
Ever heard of women conceiving by means of artificial insemination? (in English, this means injecting a man's donated sperm into the womb) No, if everyone in the world were gay, the human race could still be continued on. This seems to be a question based on hate for gay people... No hate on gays is required here... no one is to blame for anything, but if you still believe that being gay is wrong, then what could I possibly say to convince you otherwise? We all have different mind-sets; some more close-minded than others...
Artemis
2012-09-15 16:44:25 UTC
No, because we have invented artificial insemination. And if a gay couple really wants children badly enough, they are more than capable of mating with the opposite sex. What do you think Alexander the Great did? The love of his life was a man, but he still had several wives to have children. If the world was 100% homosexual, which will never happen, it wouldn't matter; we'd still survive.
Lupen ♀
2012-09-15 16:23:55 UTC
But the world will never be completely "gay", but they do have means of reproduction, just not the "traditional" way.



Besides, hating someone because of their sexual orientation because of something that COULD happen, but won't, is pretty stupid if you ask me. Right now we're incredibly overpopulated and homosexuals not having kids help a lot, not to mention some of them can give those poor orphans a home sense they /can't/ have children of their own.



Right now us straight people are the ones causing problems with our population.
Kevin
2012-09-16 02:23:34 UTC
Ever hear of serogate mothers? Or sperm donors? People are willing to raise children.



Even if the whole population were to be gay, people would still want children and families. I assure you that we have the technology for same-sex couples to continue to reproduce.



The fact that same-sex couples can't reproduce together does not define the morality of homosexuality itself. A man who is sterile, and a woman who is post-menopausal having sex, by your logic would also be immoral as well I suppose.
?
2012-09-15 16:27:40 UTC
Well If lesbians didn't want to be surrogate mothers then yes the human race would eventually come to an end. But the world... no... Earth will continue.
?
2012-09-15 16:24:27 UTC
First off fudgepacker? Second of all, lesbians have babies all the time without having sex with guys. If everyone was gay, then the gay guys would supply sperm to the lesbians, and lesbians could be surrogate moms for the gay men.
Loki
2012-09-15 16:35:28 UTC
are you a troll or are u being serious ? hellooo, ever heard of sperm banks ? and other ways for babys, it wouldnt come to an end but theres a small chance for a smaller population with only sperm banks, and with no straights also the population would be still small with no one night stands and people not getting prego by accident, so theres ur answer
2012-09-15 18:59:37 UTC
The way you typed it, it sounds like you somehow think that gays are physically incapable of breeding. True, a gay man wouldn't like having sex with a lesbian and vice versa. But they're not INCAPABLE of doing it.
?
2012-09-15 16:24:00 UTC
No, people would still have babies. Your language is disgusting, so I am pleased to tell you that gay people have been having babies for quite some time.
?
2012-09-15 16:22:01 UTC
Charming fellow you are not! Stupid you are. We can breed!
?
2012-09-15 16:32:29 UTC
Which end? :-)


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...