As to your question, Gays are a non-issue. Republicans love to chat about non issues while they send $2 trillion to Afghanistand. You do know what happen when we gave Saddam cash and chemicals right?
None of the following is true, the facts are just not there. BTW, Iraq is not vast, it's the size of Texas. Why lie?
Several years before the war the weapons inspectors were finding traces and precursor chemicals and monitoring devices were fitted to some sites in Iraq to stop the movements of them.
A lot of disinformation is trotted out about WMD. For instance there is not and never was 'weapons grade anthrax'. America, Britain and Russia all tried and failled. The spores simply cannot be made small enough to use in an effective aerosol. Hence the people who were effected by anthrax in the attacks were accidentaly infected such as the postal staff.
Chemical weapons are simply a recipe mix of quite commonly used chemicals. If you look in someones kitchen do you accuse them of having a cake if they simply have flour, fat, eggs and sugar? Hardly.
Do not forget either that whilst chemical weapons were not found in the search, they did find shell casings specifically designed and manufactured to deliver chemical weapons. There is also incontroversial evidence that chemical weapons were used in Iraq to kill opponents slaughtering hundreds of men women and children.
Nuclear weapons are harder but bear in mind that the largest part of producung nuclear weapons is the research and manufacture. Iraq was accused of attempting to obtain nuclear weapons not to manufacture. i.e. they were attempting at least to buy the parts to put one together. Nuclear bombs can be made to fit into a small suitcase. Think of the logistics of trying to find such a small item in the vast expanse of Iraq. It must be the equivelant of trying to find that proverbial needle in a million haystacks!
Whilst searching for weapons after the war the US discovered a number of jet fighters completely burried in sand dunes. If you can hide a squadron of aircraft like that, smaller items would be much easier.
Intelligence also suggest that Iraq moved a lot of items into neighbouring countries.
As for oil that question has been answered earlier this week. The US bought nearly all the oil Iraq produced before the war. In going head to head with Sadam they actually reduced that flow. Since the war the US has bought and paid for every drop of oil it gets and has not gained any advantage whatsoever.
Yes Bush and Blaire made some unwise decisions and continue now to try and bluff and bluster they way out of the mess they got into but have you stopped to consider what the possible outcome would have been if they had not gone to war. Remember it is confirmed by independent bodies that Chemical weapons had been used in Iraq.
It was probably only a matter of time before they would have been used in America and other countries.